- Fri Feb 14, 2020 7:44 pm
#542
At my institution, we experience RTD drift at couch angles approaching 90 and 270 degrees, as discussed in some of the other Topic's in this form. We are working on controlling our processes more tightly to reduce this issue. Recently, we have discussed the roll of simulation in reducing the RTD drift and improving our performance generally.
I have heard from a few sites that it is important to ensure that the patient’s face is pitched towards feet (i.e. chin slightly tucked) at simulation. With our current vendor of open-faced mask, this turns out to be somewhat difficult to. The shape of the head-bowl that lies under the custom neck cushion encourages a pitch that is neutral or slightly tilted back.
Does your clinic focus on head tilt at simulation?
Do you strive for a face-toward-toes pitch for every treatment?
Do you have an immobilization system that helps you achieve this?
What other simulations best-practices do you use?
Warm regards,
Dustin Jacqmin
I have heard from a few sites that it is important to ensure that the patient’s face is pitched towards feet (i.e. chin slightly tucked) at simulation. With our current vendor of open-faced mask, this turns out to be somewhat difficult to. The shape of the head-bowl that lies under the custom neck cushion encourages a pitch that is neutral or slightly tilted back.
Does your clinic focus on head tilt at simulation?
Do you strive for a face-toward-toes pitch for every treatment?
Do you have an immobilization system that helps you achieve this?
What other simulations best-practices do you use?
Warm regards,
Dustin Jacqmin