Forums › SGRT – Best Practice › Optimal ROI in FB setup to minimize displacement between vertebra and sternum › Reply To: Optimal ROI in FB setup to minimize displacement between vertebra and sternum
I believe that it is easier to detect (and have a more reliable value of) the pitch if a larger part of the ROI covers the lateral of the patient i.e. the side of the chest wall. We use an ROI that more or less covers the target area.
To your concern regarding the vertebra and sternum. In kV-images we have also seen some disagreement in the longitudinal direction, both for patients treated in FB and DIBH. When using the vertebra as a primary matching structure (in kV-images) we quite frequently performed couch shifts in longitudinal direction and the corresponding MV-(verification)images showed that the LNG-shift (compared to the DRR) was unnecessary and even inaccurate.
Today we use the sternum and the distance between the chest wall and vertebras as primary structures when matching kV-images and the vertebras alone have lower priority. The MV’s correspond better and we don´t have the same longitudinal displacement systemetics.
We haven’t looked into the couch vrt vs. the surface vertical.
Kind regards Annika
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.